🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Reconsider Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded panel of eleven justices. The judicial body also vacated a earlier decision from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a long-running legal battle over whether the administration has the authority and justification to send state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this month – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the use of any military personnel in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that facts are important and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” said the legal representative in a official comment.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the armed forces into American urban areas unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”