🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy could be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. However, the government vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and suitable for young users," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is largely occurring at the local government level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international debate evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are less and less prepared to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.